Usage examples: The Bridge pattern is especially useful when dealing with cross-platform apps, supporting multiple types of database servers or working with several API providers of a certain kind (for example, cloud platforms, social networks, etc.)
Identification: Bridge can be recognized by a clear distinction between some controlling entity and several different platforms that it relies on.
Conceptual Example
This example illustrates the structure of the Bridge design pattern. It focuses on answering these questions:
What classes does it consist of?
What roles do these classes play?
In what way the elements of the pattern are related?
main.py: Conceptual example
from__future__import annotationsfrom abc import ABC, abstractmethodclassAbstraction:""" The Abstraction defines the interface for the "control" part of the two class hierarchies. It maintains a reference to an object of the Implementation hierarchy and delegates all of the real work to this object. """def__init__(self,implementation: Implementation) ->None: self.implementation = implementationdefoperation(self) ->str:return (f"Abstraction: Base operation with:\n"f"{self.implementation.operation_implementation()}")classExtendedAbstraction(Abstraction):""" You can extend the Abstraction without changing the Implementation classes. """defoperation(self) ->str:return (f"ExtendedAbstraction: Extended operation with:\n"f"{self.implementation.operation_implementation()}")classImplementation(ABC):""" The Implementation defines the interface for all implementation classes. It doesn't have to match the Abstraction's interface. In fact, the two interfaces can be entirely different. Typically the Implementation interface provides only primitive operations, while the Abstraction defines higher- level operations based on those primitives. """@abstractmethoddefoperation_implementation(self) ->str:pass"""Each Concrete Implementation corresponds to a specific platform and implementsthe Implementation interface using that platform's API."""classConcreteImplementationA(Implementation):defoperation_implementation(self) ->str:return"ConcreteImplementationA: Here's the result on the platform A."classConcreteImplementationB(Implementation):defoperation_implementation(self) ->str:return"ConcreteImplementationB: Here's the result on the platform B."defclient_code(abstraction: Abstraction) ->None:""" Except for the initialization phase, where an Abstraction object gets linked with a specific Implementation object, the client code should only depend on the Abstraction class. This way the client code can support any abstraction- implementation combination. """# ...print(abstraction.operation(), end="")# ...if__name__=="__main__":""" The client code should be able to work with any pre-configured abstraction- implementation combination. """ implementation =ConcreteImplementationA() abstraction =Abstraction(implementation)client_code(abstraction)print("\n") implementation =ConcreteImplementationB() abstraction =ExtendedAbstraction(implementation)client_code(abstraction)
Output.txt: Execution result
Abstraction: Base operation with:
ConcreteImplementationA: Here's the result on the platform A.
ExtendedAbstraction: Extended operation with:
ConcreteImplementationB: Here's the result on the platform B.